Apache License mit compatibility

GPL-Kompatibilität. Die Apache Software Foundation und die Free Software Foundation (FSF) bestätigen, dass die Apache License 2.0 eine Lizenz für freie Software ist, die mit der Version 3 der GNU General Public License (GPL) kompatibel ist Apache License 2.0 Explained. Recent updates of the license, leading up to Apache License 2.0, allow it to be included by reference, instead of listed in every software file, meaning developers don't need to insert license text into the GUI. In addition, this latest version has two patent clauses. The first states the software can be used regardless of software patents which are in effect, without any further obligations. The second states that software users can't initiate. The only requirements that it holds are a disclaimer of warranty and liability, and attribution. Since the MIT license is compatible with the Apache 2.0 license (which is also a very permissive license), you can bundle those components together under the Apache license License compatibility is a legal framework that allows for pieces of software with different software licenses to be distributed together. The need for such a framework arises because the different licenses can contain contradictory requirements, rendering it impossible to legally combine source code from separately-licensed software in order to create and publish a new program. Proprietary licenses are generally program-specific and incompatible; authors must negotiate to combine.

Could we use a permissive license (Apache 2.0, BSD-2 or MIT) despite statically linking them into another AGPL v3.0 app project? Details Android Clean Architecture. One of the many reasons for adopting architecture on Android apps is simplify testability isolating the business cases code from modules that require Android dependencies. Business cases (or interactors) are implemented like. Die Apache Software-Lizenz 2.0 ist dementsprechend mit der GPL Version 3.0 kompatibel. Eine Kompatibilitätsübersicht zahlreicher Lizenzen bietet das GNU-Projekt. Dieses gibt Empfehlungen für die Wahl einer mit der GPL kompatiblen Lizenz The MIT License (X11 License) is a permissive free software license originating at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in the late 1980s. As a permissive license, it puts only very limited restriction on reuse and has, therefore, high license compatibility. The Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons projects use the alternative name Expat License Die Apache License wird beispielsweise von Android, Spring und Docker verwendet und gewährt ebenfalls keine Garantieansprüche. Jeder Mitwirkende an der Software erteilt mit der Verwendung der Apache License Rechte zur weltweiten und kostenlosen Nutzung, Verteilung, Bearbeitung und Ausführung. Selbiges gilt auch für Teile, auf die ein Patentanspruch geltend gemacht werden kann. Sollte es. For example, Apache 2.0-licensed software and GPLv2+-licensed software can both reach GPLv3 or GPLv3+, so they can be combined using GPLv3 or GPLv3+. This figure has been carefully crafted so following a path determines if two licenses are compatible

Apache-Lizenz - Wikipedi

I understand that the GNU GPL v2 and Apache License v2.0 are considered incompatible. The FSF's License List explains that this is because [Apache] has some requirements that are not in that GPL version. These include certain patent termination and indemnification provisions Die OpenSSL-Lizenz ist eine Kombination aus zwei Lizenzen, eine namens OpenSSL-Lizenz und eine aus der ursprünglichen SSLeay-Lizenz. Beide müssen befolgt werden. Die Kombination führt zu einer freien Softwarelizenz mit Copyleft, die mit der GNU GPL unvereinbar ist. Eine Werbeklausel wie in der originale

License Must Be Technology-Neutral Both allow the creation of combined works, which is what you've been asking for. If combining the two works is considered being a derivate, then this is not restricted as well by both licenses. And both licenses do not restrict to distribute the software It is based on the Apache License 2.0; the scope of the patent license has changed so that when an organization's employee works on a project, the organization does not have to license all of its patents to recipients. This patent license and the indemnification clause in section 9 make this license incompatible with GPLv2 For inclusion in an Apache Software Foundation product, we consider the following licenses to be similar in terms to the Apache License 2.0: Apache License 2.0; Apache Software License 1.1. Including variants: PHP License 3.01; MX4J License; BSD (without advertising clause). Including variants: BSD 2-clause; BSD 3-clause; DOM4J License; PostgreSQL License

Apache license 2.0, MIT or BSD - License Comparison Sny

The license of your source code must be compatible with the license of the open source code you are linking to. For instance, if your code is proprietary, you won't be allowed to use a library under the GPL license. This is where people tends to make more mistakes. Apache License 2.0. Apache License 2.0 offers more flexibility to the users The difficulty of determining license compatibility, and simply in understanding the ramifications of various licensing terms, is why license proliferation is such a bad thing. Please, please try to use a common, well understood license, such as the GPL, LGPL, BSD 2-clause or 3-clause, MIT/X consortium license, or public domain dedication, if at all possible. Whatever you do, don't invent your. It would be great If dual-license it under Apache License or MIT :) I'm not sure a) how to do this, and b) if I am allowed to license it under any other license than LGPL without breaking the rules of LGPL MIT license and Apache License only requires that you give credit to original copyright holders. If you choose, Similarly, since the MIT and BSD licenses are both GPL-compatible and can be redistributed in GPL-licensed projects, then dual licensing MIT/GPL also seems redundant. Yes. Though, sometimes a software product will claim to be dual licensed as MIT and GPL (or some permissive.

Brief: This detailed guide gives you an effective Open Source licenses comparison.With Open Source licenses explained here, it should help you choose the right Open Source license for your project. So, you're working on that cool new project for a while — and you're ready now to make the critical move from closed source to open source DFSG-compatible Licenses. All DFSG-compatible licenses. If a license is missing, please create a new paragraph similar to the existing ones and sort the licenses in alphabetical order. A simple way to determine how many packages ship a specific license is to use codesearch.debian.net: For instance use . AGPL path:debian/copyrigh APPENDIX: HOW TO APPLY THE APACHE LICENSE TO YOUR WORK. To apply the Apache License to your work, attach the following boilerplate notice, with the fields enclosed by brackets [] replaced with your own identifying information. (Don't include the brackets!) The text should be enclosed in the appropriate comment syntax for the file format. We. The reverse is also true: there are OSI-compliant licenses are not compatible with the EPL or do not permit downstream commercial re-distribution. Such licenses are not used by Eclipse projects. Are the Eclipse Public License (EPL) 1.0 and the General Public License (GPL) compatible? The EPL 1.0 and the GPL are not compatible in any combination where the result would be considered either: (a.

Ada Forge - OpenSource Licenses

Can I bundle MIT licensed components in a Apache 2

Übersicht und Kategorisierung von Freien Lizenze In most cases, permissive licenses are also compatible with copyleft licenses. There are two exceptions to this rule: The Apache 2.0 license and the original (4-clause) BSD license . The Apache 2.0's license partner rights make it incompatible with GPL v2 , but it is compatible with GPL v3

License compatibility - Wikipedi

  1. APPENDIX: HOW TO APPLY THE APACHE LICENSE TO YOUR WORK. To apply the Apache License to your work, attach the following boilerplate notice, with the fields enclosed by brackets [] replaced with your own identifying information. (Don't include the brackets!) The text should be enclosed in the appropriate comment syntax for the file format. We also recommend that a file or class name and description of purpose be included on the same printed page as the copyright notice for easier.
  2. These licenses are incompatible with the GNU GPL version 2. Academic Free License, version 1.1. Academic Free License, version 2.1. Affero General Public License, version 1.0; Apache License, version 1.0; Apache License, version 1.1; Apache Software License, version 2.0; Apple Public Source License, version 2; Common Development and Distribution License
  3. Ask questions License compatibility with MIT or Apache 2.0 Hello, libcsp seems to be under LGPL 2.1. FreeRTOS, OTOH, is under MIT and doesn't support dynamic linking. IANAL, but this seems incompatible to me. Does libcsp offer exception for static linking? Of course it's perfectly fine for libcsp project to use LGPL. There is nothing wrong with it. I just wanted to make sure that we are aware.
  4. In additions, Custom Licenses (sometimes nicknamed Vanity Licenses) may create incompatibilities with other licenses, resulting in a poor compatibility of your Work legally speaking. May I use several Licenses

license compatibility - Is it possible statically linking

Apache NetBeans Fits the Pieces Together. Development Environment, Tooling Platform and Application Framework. Fast & Smart Editing. Apache NetBeans is much more than a text editor. It highlights source code syntactically and semantically, lets you easily refactor code, with a range of handy and powerful tools. Java, JavaScript, PHP, HTML5, CSS, and More. Apache NetBeans provides editors. a) Check how many packages you have in your node-modules folder. b) what unique licenses you're using and if there are conflicts. I'm using here an example project using mainly Preact (via.

Freizügige Open-Source-Lizenz - Wikipedi

Zur Anwendung der Apache-Lizenz auf Ihr Werk hängen Sie ihm den folgenden Standardhinweis an, wobei Sie die von eckigen Klammern [] eingeschlossenen Felder durch Ihre eigenen Angaben ersetzen. (Die eckigen Klammern dabei weglassen!) Der Text muss von der entsprechenden Kommentarsyntax für das Dateiformat umschlossen sein. Wir empfehlen außerdem, einen Datei- oder Klassennamen und eine Beschreibung des Zwecks auf derselben Druckseite wie der Urheberrechtshinweis anzugeben, damit das. Licenses that are popular and widely-used or with strong communities The below list is based on publicly available statistics obtained at the time of the Report of License Proliferation Committee. Apache License 2.0 (Apache-2.0) 3-clause BSD license (BSD-3-Clause) 2-clause BSD license (BSD-2-Clause) GNU General Public License (GPL HTTP/2 in Apache httpd. The HTTP/2 protocol is implemented by its own httpd module, aptly named mod_http2. It implements the complete set of features described by RFC 7540 and supports HTTP/2 over cleartext (http:), as well as secure (https:) connections. The cleartext variant is named ' h2c ', the secure one ' h2 '

Apache License (v. 2.0): http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2..html Beerware License: http://people.freebsd.org/~phk/ Boost Software License (Einordnung unklar): http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.tx The two Apache 2 licensed components are a sticky point, however. Apache 2 is NOT compatible with GPLv2, but IS compatible with GPLv3. Drupal is also compatible with GPLv3. Thus, if you wanted to mix them all together and distribute them you could do so only using GPLv3. While permissible to do, we do not allow GPLv3-only code in CVS. That's not because GPLv3 is bad, but because we do not want to put people in the situation of having some modules that are GPLv2-only (or bridge to.

When talking about open source licenses, someone who says compatible generally means one-way compatibility, where code from a more permissive license can be used as part of a project whose overall license is more restrictive, but not vice versa. For example, if the Mozilla Project switches to MPL 2, Firefox may quickly contain Apache code (because the permissive Apache license will be compatible with Firefox's overall MPL license), but your Apache webserver won't have any. This is different from a traditional dual-license, which never requires publication under both licenses, and so always gives you the option of releasing incompatibly-licensed code. No GPL-compatible license can perfectly preserve the original author's ability to reuse downstream derivatives, but the last two restrictions serve to increase the probability that such reuse can occur in the broadest possible set of circumstances

MIT License - Wikipedi

Guideline für Open Source Software - SUCKUP

Open-Source-Lizenzen und was ich damit machen dar

The Apache Tomcat software is developed in an open and participatory environment and released under the Apache License version 2. The Apache Tomcat project is intended to be a collaboration of the best-of-breed developers from around the world. We invite you to participate in this open development project. To learn more about getting involved, click here. Apache Tomcat software powers numerous. Apache2 License Checker. Automated license checker for validating project dependencies for compatible Apache2 licenses. Use with your project. Run npm install @bbc/apache2-license-checker --save-dev; Modify your package.json to include apache2-license-checker as part of your test script; For example:.. The Eclipse Foundation views license compatibility through the lens of enabling successful commercial adoption of Eclipse technology in software products and services. We wish to create a commercial ecosystem based on the redistribution of Eclipse software technologies in commercially licensed software products. Determining whether a license for third-party code is acceptable often requires the input and advice of The Eclipse Foundation's legal advisors

Open Source Licenses and their Compatibilit

  1. Applying the Apache license, version 2.0 This document is to help Apache developers understand what they need to do to apply the Apache License, Version 2.0 or ALv2 to Apache software, including source code, documentation, and binary distributions. It is descriptive guidance, and does not supplant or otherwise modify any of the terms within the license itself
  2. The Apache 2.0 license is a permissive free software license by the Apache Software Foundation. The 2.0 version requires preservation of the copyright notice and disclaimer. It also allows the.
  3. Apache License. It's specified on FontsArena as Apache License, version 2.0 See the license's official webpage. It's one of the most permissive licenses: software licensed under Apache License can be freely used, modified, distributed, and sold.Apache License 2.0 is compatible with version 3 of the GNU General Public License (GPL)
  4. Apache Software Foundation. Spaces; Hit enter to search. Help. Online Help Keyboard Shortcuts Feed Builder What's new What's new Available Gadgets About Confluence Log in Sign up Apache Kafka. Pages; Blog; Space shortcuts. Retrospectives; Child pages. Index; Compatibility Matrix; Browse pages. Configure Space tools.
  5. Offizielle Apache OpenOffice Download-Webseite. Folge Apache OpenOffice, der freien Büro-Software mit über 310 Millionen geprüften Downloads

Top 10 Apache License Questions Answered - WhiteSourc

  1. GPL compatibility is defined by the FSF, on that same page, as: This means you can combine a module which was released under that [compatible] license with a GPL-covered module to make one larger program. Compatibility is enforced within the GPL by section 2b: 2b) You must cause any work that you distribute or publish, that in whole or in part contains or is derived from the Program or any.
  2. The Apache License is a permissive free software license written by the Apache Software Foundation (ASF). It allows users to use the software for any purpose, to distribute it, to modify it, and to distribute modified versions of the software under the terms of the license, without concern for royalties. The ASF and its projects release their software products under the Apache License. The.
  3. g models. It is designed to scale up from single servers to thousands of machines, each offering local.
  4. Whether a license is GPL-compatible or not can be mechanically deduced by looking at its terms, and neither the FSF nor anybody else has the power to declare some license GPL-compatible because they think it is morally or politically good. The FSF doesn't seem to have much of a political problem with the new Apache license, but it is still not GPL-compatible
  5. ImageMagick is free image-processing software distributed under a derived Apache 2.0 license. Home; Download; Tools; CLI; Develop; Community; Search. License . Terms and Conditions for Use, Reproduction, and Distribution • How to Apply the License to your Work. Before we get to the text of the license, lets just review what the license says in simple terms: It allows you to: freely download.
  6. Apache SSL/TLS Encryption. The Apache HTTP Server module mod_ssl provides an interface to the OpenSSL library, which provides Strong Encryption using the Secure Sockets Layer and Transport Layer Security protocols. The module and this documentation are based on Ralf S. Engelschall's mod_ssl project
  7. Official Apache OpenOffice download page. Join the OpenOffice revolution, the free office productivity suite with over 310 million trusted downloads
GNU General Public License - Wikipedia

licensing - Is BSD license compatible with Apache

Which License Should I Use? MIT vs

  1. Curator 4.2.x supports ZooKeeper 3.4.x ensembles in a soft-compatibility mode. To use this mode you must exclude ZooKeeper when adding Curator to your dependency management tool. You must add a dependency on ZooKeeper 3.4.x also. Curator will detect which ZooKeeper library is in use and automatically set ZooKeeper 3.4 compatibility mode as needed
  2. Re: OAuth2 license compatible with Apache License: Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 12:00:05 GMT: On May 18, 2012, at 3:22 AM, seba.wagner@gmail.com wrote: > Dear Legal team, > > could you check if the License of OAuth2 (see attached conversation) is compatible with Apache License? It seems to be however as it does directly refer to any of the licenses.
  3. A license designated as a Creative Commons Compatible License as defined in BY-SA 3.0. Currently, no non-CC licenses have been designated as compatible with BY-SA 3.0. Other licenses may be added to this list at any time according to the established process and criteria. Once a license has been added to this list, it will not be removed

Apache License - Wikipedi

Apache MyFaces is a project of the Apache Software Foundation, and hosts several sub-projects relating to the JavaServer™ Faces (JSF) technology The Apache license, on the other hand, is argued by some not to be GPLv2 compatible, which makes it tricky to use in connection with GPLv2 licensed code - the GPLv2 is still by far the most popular open source license, and unambiguous, undisputed GPL compatibility was a crucial qualifier for any license considered for use in the JCP. (Even the BSD license has been argued not to be GPL. 242 downloads Updated: April 22, 2021 Apache License 2.0 / MIT License / AGPL . 3.0 / 5 2. Review Free Download specifications 100% FREE report malware. Try a self-hosted, open-source application. To avoid compatibility issues it is easiest for us to use the same license. Apache 2.0 is a permissive license that grants users rights to use, modify and distribute the source code. Using this license brings some obligations like the need to include state changes of the source code and to add a license and copyright notice The MIT license is GPL-compatible, but unlike the traditionally restrictive GPL, it isn't viral. This means that developers can modify the original code without infecting the resultant derivative code with the original license. Apache 2.0 License. This license was released in 2004, replacing the original Apache version 1.1. Like the modified BSD and MIT licenses, the Apache 2.0 is permissive in nature

Why is the GNU GPL v3 compatible with the Apache License v2

Our consideration of Apache/GPL license compatibility has focused on the patent termination clause in the Apache license. As we explained above in § 4.1, this clause is compatible with Draft 3. Android Apache License and GPL 2 licenses compatibility More specifically GPL v2 requires all derived works and programs to have the same license as it has, therefore Apache shouldn't be allowed inside android.

Verschiedene Lizenzen und Kommentare - GNU-Projekt - Free

The Apache Foundation recommends taking the additional step of adding a boilerplate notice to the header of each source file. You can find the notice in the appendix at the very end of the license text. Add Apache-2.0 to your project's package description, if applicable (e.g., Node.js, Ruby, and Rust). This will ensure the license is displayed in package directories I'm trying to figure out if I can use CC-BY-4. components (specifically an image) in an Apache 2.0 licensed project. I've read both the licenses a couple times now and I don't see anything that would prevent this but I wanted to double-check in case anyone is aware of something in one of the licenses that would restrict this but I'm not a lawyer so I really have no idea Die Apache-Lizenz (2.0) ist hingegen mit der GNU GPL (Version 3) kompatibel. Da parallel zur Software auch die Handbücher zur Nutzung lizensiert werden mussten, entwickelte sich die GNU Free Documentation License. Diese wird heute auch für anderweitig freie Inhalte verwendet. Auch Wikipedia ist unter GNU lizensiert

licensing - MIT vs GPL license - Stack Overflo

Intel is thrilled to see OpenSSL moving to the standard Apache 2.0 license, improving license compatibility within the Open Source ecosystem, said Imad Sousou, Vice President and General Manager of the Open Source Technology Center, Intel. This will help defragment the open source cryptography ecosystem, leading to stronger and more pervasive use of crypto to improve privacy and security in the global technology infrastructure Follow TLDRLegal. FEATURED. Commons Clause License Condition v1.0 19907 0. Code License managed by kevin. 2 Rules 1 Rules 2 Rules. Modify Distribute Commercial Use Include Copyright Include Notice. YouTube Terms of Service 63022 7. Terms of Service managed by seldon. Sleepycat License 26356 4

@cypressf/webassembly - npm Package Health Analysis | SnykOpen Source Licenses Comparison [Guide]Compare the Best Javascript Chart Libraries – Sicara's blogDog Roverhound - Hundetraining WordPress Theme

Cross Platform. Apache NetBeans can be installed on all operating systems that support Java, i.e, Windows, Linux, Mac OSX and BSD. Write Once, Run Anywhere, applies to NetBeans too MIT licenses allow commercial use. As the MIT license falls in the BSD-style class of licenses, users do not have to provide any other source code when releasing new software. Including the attributions and original MIT license in the reused code will suffice, making MIT licenses suitable for commercial use The Apache license includes important protection against patent aggression, but it is not compatible with the GPL, version 2. To avoid problems using Rust with GPL2, it is alternately MIT licensed. To avoid problems using Rust with GPL2, it is alternately MIT licensed Licenses currently found in Debian main include: GNU General Public License (common) GNU Lesser General Public License (common) GNU Library General Public License (common) Modified BSD License (common) Perl Artistic license (common) Apache License; Expat/MIT-style licenses; zlib-style licenses; LaTeX Project Public License; Python Software Foundation License The Apache Tomcat software is developed in an open and participatory environment and released under the Apache License version 2. The Apache Tomcat project is intended to be a collaboration of the best-of-breed developers from around the world. We invite you to participate in this open development project. To learn more about getting involved

  • Hercules Montfoort Plus F8 test.
  • Überlagerung von Spannungsquellen.
  • Pct northern terminus.
  • Ninjago Kampf.
  • Katze nachts laut.
  • Küss den Frosch ganzer Film Deutsch.
  • Nova Phantom review.
  • The Good Doctor Staffel 4 Sky Ticket.
  • Fielmann Bankverbindung.
  • Außergewöhnliche Kuchen einfach.
  • Aufstehen nach Sturz Senioren.
  • 1001 Arabian Nights 7 free.
  • Sichler Deckenventilator Test.
  • Tanztherapie Berufschancen.
  • E bike rahmenhöhe 60 cm damen.
  • Wasserwechsel Aquarium notwendig.
  • Schlossstraße Steglitz plz.
  • Angebote bei McDonald's.
  • Lehrergehalt Schloss Salem.
  • Gebrauchte nobeluhren.
  • Osb platten schwimmend verlegen oder verschrauben.
  • Gelten busfahrkarten auch für Zug.
  • Best webtoon romance.
  • Mieterschutzbund koblenz Öffnungszeiten.
  • Wet Wohnungen Wiener Neustadt.
  • Militärparade Berlin.
  • Goldwell System Color Remover.
  • 2D Barcode.
  • Fairtrade Bananen Preis Edeka.
  • Pflaumenregen Shanghai.
  • Gw2 meta.
  • Coraline Zusammenfassung.
  • Soziales Engagement jugendalter Statistik.
  • Wirtschaftsinformatik Master Uni Augsburg.
  • Wegbeleuchtung selber bauen.
  • Gehört Ponnath zu Tönnies.
  • Salzweg England.
  • Koffer direkt.
  • Wildpferderassen Liste.
  • Chongqing Wohnung kaufen.
  • Doctolib spam.